Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Selling US Sovereignty

Saturday, August 11th, 2007

What hath debt wrought?

well after my two week stint in Scotland I can tell you that the dollar is week. Against the Pound, the Euro, you name it. I actually made money buy getting pounds and selling them back … the dollar had dropped in the two weeks we were in the UK. Excessive interest cutting in order to prop up the crappy US economy is the reason no doubt. But now we have another issue to contend with … China.

Two officials at leading Communist Party bodies have given interviews in recent days warning - for the first time - that Beijing may use its $1.33 trillion (£658bn) of foreign reserves as a political weapon to counter pressure from the US Congress.

Described as China’s “nuclear option” in the state media, such action could trigger a dollar crash at a time when the US currency is already breaking down through historic support levels.

While it’s true that the power house Chinese economy depends on a marginally robust US economy to keep it afloat there is one small thing that makes the threat credible … Chinese politicians don’t have to worry about reelection, pissed off voters, or much of anything really, it’s a totalitarian regime. Kind of gives them a few wild cards in their hand at the showdown.

“China has accumulated a large sum of US dollars. Such a big sum, of which a considerable portion is in US treasury bonds, contributes a great deal to maintaining the position of the dollar as a reserve currency. Russia, Switzerland, and several other countries have reduced the their dollar holdings.

“China is unlikely to follow suit as long as the yuan’s exchange rate is stable against the dollar. The Chinese central bank will be forced to sell dollars once the yuan appreciated dramatically, which might lead to a mass depreciation of the dollar,” he told China Daily.

Now the US could start to impose trade legislation but who is kidding who? We don’t have the stones to pay for shooting wars as we go, let alone a trade war. While this is almost certainly posturing it does highlight how vulnerable we have made ourselves by following a “growth at all costs” trade policy and rushing head long into globalization with countries that don’t really share our enthusiasm for mindless consumerism.

Update: Mr. Anderson makes the reasonable point that the dollar weakening has more to do lately with printing dollars then interest rate cutting which is true. The interest rate cutting has been there of course over the last 6 years in order to “stimulate the economy”. Apparently the tax cuts weren’t enough. Also, it’s worth mentioning, the tax cuts have also contributed to the problem by creating more debt.

What kind of American are You?

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2007

Here is a sample of questions used on the naturalization test at the INS. If you are an Immigrant and want to be a citizen, you have to pass this test. See if you can do it. I took it and I don’t mean to be boastful (well, OK yes I do), but I got 100%. Not quite as moronic as most internet tests.

Take the test and see if you can pass.

No cheating, no googling, and be honest.

Help Me Out … Can This Be Real?

Monday, June 18th, 2007

With Rudy Giuliani and John McCain as front runners in the GOP presidential race, it’s pretty safe to say that the hard-core Christian fundamentalist wing of the Republican party has been effectively neutered in the upcoming race (something we can all thank the lord for). The social conservative wing does have their man though in the person of Kansas senator Sam Brownback. You might remember that senator Brownback was one of the ones who raised their hand in the first Republican debate when the moderator asked the question “…is there anyone who does not believe in evolution along with Gov. Mike Huckabee and Rep. Tom Trancredo.

Now I understand politics and I also understand that evolutionary biology is a tricky thing, after all who didn’t have trouble figuring out just what the heck Meiosis and mitosis was all about, let alone the finer points of evolutionary science. All it means is that there are three guys running for president who don’t understand science out of ten. Evolution is complex, but other things like the shape of the earth is not. Having said that, there are a small number of people who believe wacky things. Some will tell you that man never landed on the moon or that President Bush masterminded 9/11 wacky stuff sure but hey people have a lot of time on their hands. You would think though that somethings are not controversial like for instance that shape of the earth and for most of us it’s not. But there are those who disagree like the Flat Earth Society.

Now I would think that the Flat Earth Society would be a marginal group anywhere. I would be hard pressed to imagine any group where such beliefs were given safe harbor. Try to think for yourself where could one go where the idea that the earth is flat would be not be dismissed with prejudice but, in fact, enthusiastically embraced.

I present to you Blogs 4 Brownback and the latest post telling us that this earth is a globe non-sense is simply the work of liberal pseudo science.

In an earlier post in which I categorically disproved the time-honored distortion of Heliocentrism, astute readers informed me of the Scriptural evidence that the world is, in fact, not round. Naturally, this piqued my interest, since a strict and literal reading of the Holy Bible is the only correct and proper method of doing so. If one is not prepared to accept the entirety of the Word of God as Truth, one should prepare for damnation. Not only is that good moral advice, that is good science.

Yes you astute readers will also notice that the idea that the earth is the center of the universe is also defended. As I read the blog I found some voices of protest, some folks were actually trying to engage the blog author to explain his views on such nonsense, but the scary thing is that there were as many commenters defending the blog author as there were commenters telling him he was off his rocker.

Again, not accepting evolution is one thing, it is a complex theory and it requires much study and there is so much non-sense out there confusing the discussion that I can see where someone would get confused … but a flat earth? So my question is, is this for real? I’m willing to give this the benefit of the doubt that Blogs 4 Brownback is a brilliantly conceived satire on the followers of senator Brownback. But frankly I just can’t tell. I need you all to read a few of these posts and tell me that this is an elaborate hoax.

Because if it’s not, senator Brownback should be disqualified from running based just on that fact that his constituency is made up primarily from the ranks of the hopelessly psychotic.

News and Notes

Tuesday, May 29th, 2007

Submitted for your approval … news from around the world and around the bend.

Attack of the 30 ft Monkeys!!!!!
Scotland is throwing a six city design festival in all of its major cities and to attract some attention it has commissioned Stefan Sagmeister, who has previously designed album covers for the Rolling Stones and Lou Reed to create 6 inflatable monkeys to adorn the festival sites. The six creations all have a word attached that spells out the phrase “Everyone always thinks they are right”. I know I do.

30 Ft Monkeys

Crime and Punishment
China is in the middle of a rapid economic growth spurt, despite the fact that it is still a totalitarian dictatorship. But when you combine freewheeling all-hogs-to-the-trough capitalism with hard line oppression sometimes you get things that seem like justice. In this case a Chinese court sentenced the former director of the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA), Zheng Xiaoyu, to death for massive corruption and dereliction of duty. The corruption involved about $650,000 worth of bribes in both cash and gifts and now it looks like ol’ Zheng is going to pay the ultimate price for a crime that would hardly draw probation if it happened here in the US. Hell, here the guy would get a medal.

Higher Gas Prices Getting You Down?
The retailing juggernaut Wal-Mart may finally meet its match in the form of higher gas prices.

Wal-Mart warned this month that second-quarter earnings might miss analysts’ consensus of 79 cents a share as it offered more discounts and as high gas prices took cash out of the pockets of lower-income shoppers.

Actually I think that it will become increasingly obvious that the productivity gains that have been realized on the back of cheap oil will come home top roost for companies who’s processes depend totally on “just in time” inventory made possible by tactics such as Wal-Marts “rolling warehouse”. Live by the pump, die by the pump.

They Just Don’t Get It.
In the category of “mother of all bad ideas” …

Cox Communications has signed a deal with ABC and ESPN to provide on-demand content to customers, however, you will not be able to use the fast-forward feature on your DVR while watching that programming.

OK so then why would I buy a DVR again? Advertisers need to understand that consumers demand value from advertising. Every single effort to force us to watch advertising will fail because if forced to watch something we will resent it. It’s like the gnawing compulsion I feel to nail a MBA grad to a tree when I have to sit though an anti-piracy advertisement on a DVD THAT I JUST BOUGHT!!!!

History Repeats Itself

Monday, May 7th, 2007

When they outsourced the assembly line workers,
I remained silent;
I was not an assembly line worker.

When they outsourced the call center workers,
I remained silent;
I was not a call center worker.

When they outsourced the accountants, the engineers, and the software developers,
I remained silent;
I was not an accountant, engineer, or a software developer.

I’m a wall Street Journal Economist, when they outsourced my job,
There was no one left to speak out.

…but the good news is there was no one left to shop at Wal-Mart either so maybe they will go away too. :)

Health Care Debate Part II

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

In a previous post that inspired a lively discussion I talked about my inability to obtain health insurance. Not obtain affordable health insurance, but my inability to obtain it at any price without directly lying to the insurance company about my heath status. My issues has to do with a two rather minor conditions that have been diagnosed but have no real “cure” things that I just sort of have to live with and don’t really effect my overall health but, from an actuarial perspective, makes me an “unsafe” bet.

The main point of that post was that any health care regime which relies in part on individuals trying to obtain health insurance in the individual market is unworkable and a non-starter. I thought that if I keep the focus of my statement narrow it would be rather uncontroversial … but I was wrong. However rather then address my point directly, I most of the commenters decided to bring up ancillary arguments like the state of the U K’s National health Insurance scheme. One argument that I wanted to address in a bit more depth is one that Ricky West brought up about paying for Rosie O’Donald’s health care.

Now as a practical matter it is unlikely that anyone will ever have to pay for Ms. O’Donald’s health care. She is wealthy and in all likelihood well insured so the specific fear of paying for the medical care of a shrill, outspoken, lesbian, liberal is probably misplaced. However, I did in fact make a similar argument during the Terry Shivo debate about why should tax payer money be used to sustain the body of a vegetable … so I think the larger question is valid. What obligation do we as a society have to pay for the health care of those who are, for whatever reason, unable to do so?

My answer to Ricky’s question, and any one else who might ask it, is because we already do. We, as a society, have decided that we are unwilling to allow some one to die on the street simply because they are unable to pay for medical treatment. Emergency rooms are crammed in large cities because they are required by law to take all comers regardless of their ability to pay. To the extent that this increases the cost to consumers of health care and insurance companies or to the federal government, we all absolutely pay for the health care of others. This is not eve debatable.

The question I have for Ricky and others is if an accident should befall me while I am in this window where I cannot be covered (though no fault of my own other then bad genes) because I am too “rich” for government help and too much of a risk for privet insurance, should I be allowed to die on the street? And let’s not even make it about me, the bigger question is should we, as a society, make it a policy to refused treatment to anyone who cannot pay for medical care?

I ask this question because as long as we decide, as a matter of policy, that inability to pay should not be a criteria for refusing medical care, we as individuals will all be on the hook for paying for someone else’s health care bills though higher costs and insurance premiums. In other words, the question Ricky asks, Rosie O’Donald not withstanding, has already been settled and to change that you must come out in favor of allowing people to die simply for lack of funds.

Anyone prepared to do that?

The Health Care Debate

Monday, March 12th, 2007

The nuances of the health care situation in the US is pretty complex and it is further complicated by those who seek to obscure the conversation with platitudes about communism and socialism and lazy people who simply don’t want to take responsibility for their own lives. The problem is that, like all political discussions, both sides are largely right to a point; but only if you want to leave out half of the story which is, in a word my 15 year old charge might use, retarded. Rather then get into the issue with all of its implications and all of the messy economic details I would like to focus this post on one narrow point in the larger discussion.

In any debate about the state of US health care there will come a point where someone will talk about all the people that can’t get heath insurance or the people who have gone bankrupt due to their inability to get health coverage. About this time someone, typically a conservative or libertarian (usually one who has been employed in a steady job for most of their lives, thoroughly insulated from any worries about their heath care situation), will blame the victim saying that it is their fault for not having adequate insurance. After all, they will bleat, are “no excuses” … that even if the bare minimum of coverage costs their entire weekly take-home pay, not having heath care is a serious abjection of their fiduciary responsibility. As a rebuttal someone will mention that it is not always possible to get coverage at any price … that for profit insurance companies will simply not cover people with health problems for obvious reasons.

These brave defender of the free market in heath care, a market that most of us have never had to participate in as an individual consumer, will then wave their hand and say nonsense, “it may be expensive, but you can always get the coverage”. Well guess what gang, this is bullshit and I know because I am now in that situation.

As you might have read I recently got a job, since I left my last job my I have been covered by a short term policy that will expire in a few days. The group coverage on my new job will not kick in for 90 days. So I have been trying to get a policy to cover me in case something happens over the next three months. Well I have already been turned down by one company and the second one I applied to said that they will probably not cover me, but if they do I will have a number of exclusions. additionally it will be at least 4 weeks before they can approve my application so in any even I will be exposed for about a month. Why?

I am a 40 something guy and extremely healthy I have had only a few hospital visits in my life, and those were for relatively minor things, tonsils, appendix, gall bladder stuff like that. The last time I went in for the gall bladder I came razor close to having my coverage denied after the fact do to the timing of my companies bankruptcy and the fact that they were not funding the health care kitty in the final days of their existence (illegally I might add, but there is no punishment for a bankrupt corporation ). I only have one real health issue, high cholesterol and this is the big red flag for the insurance companies. In other words, I am not a perfect specimen of health. I mean if a non-smoking, reasonably healthy middle aged guy can’t get covered then the private insurance market is not a solution to the health care issue (I have tried a number of things that I have not enumerated here so if anyone has any suggestion great, but I have probably tried them already). People with more serious issues are simply shit out of luck

It looks like I will simply have to go without insurance until my group coverage kicks in and wing it. Now the odds are I will be OK, but all it will take is one accident and the rest of my financial life will literally be in tatters. I don’t like those odds, but I don’t know as I will have any choice.

I will continue to secure coverage but at this point no matter what there will be a window because I won;t be able to get approved before my existing coverage runs out. The bottom line is that if anyone advocates any health care policy that involves reliance in any way on private individual insurance please tell them for me that is simply won’t work and that they don’t have any clue what they are talking about.

The Solution to Michigan’s Problems (Rick)

Wednesday, March 7th, 2007

I moved back to Michigan last fall bucking a trend that started when the auto industry went into a big decline after the salad days of the 90’s .com boom in 2000. The economic problems facing Michigan are well understood but the solutions are much more difficult. There are a lot of people who want to blame it all on the Governor Jennifer Granholm and while there is a lot of room for criticism the facts are that there is little she or any Governor can do to jump start an economy that is wholly and completely beholden to the domestic auto industry which is dead, dead, dead.

She has decided, for better or worse to hold the line on things like education and services over cutting taxes and while you can argue all you want about whether or not the tax rate in MI is too high (it is in the top 20% per capita). The fact is you could cut state taxes in half and it still would not stem the tide of job losses in Michigan.

Frankly what Michigan needs is a way to attract top level entrepreneurial talent to Michigan. We need a plan that will make the state attractive to a highly imaginative, wealthy, and talented pool of individuals who can broaden the economy and bring innovation to the state. Michigan needs a way to make the state a magnet to the kind of people with the creativity to make Michigan an attractive place to live for the movers and shakers of the new millennia. Frankly there is one idea that will do just that.

With a stroke the pen the people of Michigan could make this state just such a place. Overnight, Michigan will be able to boast that we have something that no other state can offer and will attract wealthy and creative individuals in droves. Magically Michigan will be transformed by a population of hard working, driven, individuals who can spruce up this state like no other single group of people can. And what is this magic bullet?

What is this plan that is so simple and will cost the tax payers of Michigan not one thin dime out of their wallet? What could the State of Michigan do that would make it a Mecca for a the kind of people that have proven over and over again that they can turn decay and blight into real estate gold?

(more…)